Python & Django development — for product teams and agencies worldwide

Python backends that handle real traffic, scale clean, and carry the AI features you will need next.

Custom Python engineering on Django, FastAPI, and the data stack that AI runs on. We ship Python applications with p95 latency under 200 ms, 85%+ test coverage on critical paths, typed end to end with Pydantic and mypy, and an architecture ready for the RAG systems and AI workflows most products will need within the year.

1,000+
Websites shipped since 2015
10yrs
Building on WordPress
4.9
Across 1,000+ reviews
95+
Lighthouse mobile baseline · every site
The real cost

A slow, untyped, or AI-unready Python backend is a tax you pay every quarter.

Most product teams discover their Python backend is holding the business back only after a year in production — p95 latency has crept up, the codebase has no type safety so every change is a gamble, and the AI feature the board now wants cannot be added without a rebuild. The three observations below are what we say out loud on every Python discovery call.

01

Python is not slow. Your database and your blocking calls are.

The most common objection to Python — that it is slow — barely applies to a web backend, because the request spends almost all of its time waiting on the database, not running Python. A slow Python endpoint is slow for the same reasons a slow backend in any language is slow: N+1 queries, missing indexes, no caching, and synchronous external calls made one after another. We have inherited many Python apps blamed on the language, and the cause was the database every time. Fix the queries and the same endpoint moves from a 2-second p95 to under 200 milliseconds.

02

Untyped Python is a codebase nobody can refactor safely.

Python lets you ship without type hints, and most Python codebases take that offer. The cost is invisible at first and brutal later: with no type checker, every change is a gamble, every new engineer onboards slowly, and the codebase becomes a place people are afraid to touch. Typed Python — type hints throughout, Pydantic at the edges, mypy in strict mode on every CI run — turns a gamble into a guarantee. The type checker catches the mismatch before production. It is also the foundation for reliable AI features, where the model's unpredictable output has to be parsed into a known shape before anything trusts it.

03

The Python you ship today is the foundation your AI features run on tomorrow.

Most products will need an AI feature within the next year — a search that understands meaning, an assistant, a workflow that classifies or drafts. Whether that is a clean addition or a painful rebuild is decided now, by the backend underneath. A typed, tested, well-structured Python backend lets a retrieval-augmented feature or an AI workflow be added as a service. A tangled one forces a rebuild before the AI work can even start. We build Python backends with that next step already in mind, because we also build the AI — see our AI Engineering practice.

What we build

Six kinds of Python build, each engineered to last a decade.

Django applications

Full products built on Django 5 with Python 3.12+ — SaaS platforms, marketplaces, content systems, internal tools. The Django ORM with proper eager-loading, a tightened admin your ops team can actually run, secure defaults on from day one.

FastAPI services

Lean, async, typed services for APIs, microservices, and AI backends. FastAPI on Starlette with Pydantic validation at every edge, automatic OpenAPI documentation, dependency injection, and streaming responses. The right shape for I/O-bound workloads.

Django REST Framework APIs

Production APIs for mobile apps, single-page frontends, and partner integrations — without leaving Django. DRF serializers, token and session auth, throttling, versioning, filtering, and OpenAPI schema generation built into the product backend.

AI & data backends

The Python layer AI runs on — retrieval-augmented generation, vector search, LLM integration, and the data pipelines that feed them. FastAPI, Pydantic, PostgreSQL with pgvector, the OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs behind a thin model abstraction.

Python automation & pipelines

Background processing, scheduled jobs, ETL, scraping, and data pipelines. Celery with Redis for task queues, scheduled work that runs reliably, and pipelines that move data between systems without falling over at 3 AM.

Performance & async migration

p95 latency under 200 ms, query count under 10 per endpoint, cache hit ratio above 80%. Profiled production databases, N+1 elimination, Redis caching, and WSGI-to-ASGI async migrations for the I/O-bound workloads that earn it.

Beyond the build

The work that keeps the site healthy after launch.

A WordPress site is healthy only as long as someone is paying attention to it. We offer three engagement types alongside the build itself — for clients moving onto WordPress from another platform, for teams who need ongoing engineering after launch, and for sites that need their SEO foundations set up properly from day one.

WordPress migrations

Moving from Wix, Squarespace, Shopify, Drupal, Joomla, Ghost, or a legacy WordPress install. We migrate content cleanly, preserve URL structure with a proper 301 redirect map, and ship a custom WordPress build at the end of it — not a like-for-like rebuild of what you had.

  • Content audit and IA review before migration
  • URL-to-URL 301 redirect map · SEO equity preserved
  • Custom theme + content modelling on landing
  • Performance and accessibility brought up to baseline

Maintenance, support & security

Monthly retainers covering WordPress core and plugin updates, security patches, daily backups, uptime monitoring, performance monitoring, malware scanning, and a fixed allocation of editorial and development hours. For clients without a dedicated WordPress engineer in-house, this is how the site stays healthy past month one.

  • Plugin / core updates · weekly cadence
  • Daily off-site backups · quarterly restore drill
  • Cloudflare WAF · uptime & CWV monitoring
  • Allocated hours: editorial, bug fixes, small features

On-page SEO setup

WordPress SEO done properly from launch — Yoast, Rank Math, or AIOSEO configured to the site, schema markup baked into every template (Article, Product, FAQ, BreadcrumbList, Organization), XML sitemaps, robots.txt, hreflang for multilingual sites, and indexing strategy aligned with what you actually want to rank for.

  • Schema markup per template type
  • Internal linking architecture from day one
  • Core Web Vitals tuned for ranking
  • AI-search citation-ready content patterns
Performance & accessibility

The numbers every WordPress site we ship has to hit.

Every site is shipped against four hard targets. We measure, we tune, we re-measure. Below the line, the build is not done — and the engagement is not closed — until each number is in the green.

01 — Core Web Vitals

LCP under 1.5s · CLS under 0.05 · INP under 100ms

Real-Chrome-user metrics, measured continuously after launch. Sub-1.5s LCP on every primary template. Failing CWV is not an option — Google ranks sites that pass them visibly higher in 2026.

LCP 1.2s CLS 0.02 INP 68ms TTFB 220ms CDN edge cache Object + page cache PHP 8.3 PASSING · GREEN
02 — Lighthouse score

95+ on mobile · 99+ on desktop · every page

Performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO measured in Lighthouse with mobile throttling enabled. Below 90 mobile, we hold the launch. Most pages clear 95 on mobile and 99 on desktop.

96 PERFORMANCE 100 A11Y 100 SEO
03 — Accessibility

WCAG 2.2 AA · baseline on every build

Colour contrast checked per token. Keyboard navigation tested per template. Screen-reader landmarks audited. Form labels reviewed. Live regions for dynamic content. Accessibility is part of the build, not a fix after launch.

Colour contrast · 7.2:1 (AAA) Keyboard nav · all interactive elements Screen-reader landmarks · header, nav, main, footer
04 — Security & uptime

Modern PHP · WAF · daily backups · 99.9% SLA

Modern PHP, Cloudflare WAF, daily off-site backups, uptime monitoring, plugin and core update cadence, file-integrity monitoring. The site stays healthy after launch — not just during it.

WAF · ACTIVE 99.9 % uptime SLA MONITORED 8.3 PHP version CURRENT
How we work

Five steps from brief to a site that loads and lasts.

The process below has stayed the same for ten years and 1,000+ WordPress builds. Every step is required. Skipping any one of them is how WordPress sites end up slow, fragile, or unmaintainable.

01

Brief and content model

We learn the business, the editorial cadence, the current site (if any), the audience, and the integrations the site has to live with. We finish with a written brief and a content model on paper.

02

Architecture and engineering plan

Custom post types, taxonomy, content blocks, hosting plan, caching plan, performance targets, accessibility targets. The architecture is decided before any visual work starts.

03

Custom theme development

Custom theme. ACF Pro for content modelling. Minimal plugin footprint. Modern PHP. Performance and accessibility tuned per template. Weekly demos, two-week sprints.

04

Performance and accessibility testing

Real-device testing across Chrome, Safari, Firefox. Core Web Vitals tuned on live URLs. WCAG 2.2 AA audit. Editorial UAT — the team that will run the site uses it before we ship.

05

Launch, monitor, maintain

Launch checklist, 301 redirect map verified, sitemap, GSC and analytics live. Monthly maintenance from day one. Quarterly performance and SEO reviews.

Selected work

Websites we have shipped across SaaS, services, publishing, and e-commerce.

Six websites from the last 24 months. Every one of them passes Core Web Vitals, hits WCAG 2.2 AA, and was built on WordPress with a custom theme and a minimal plugin footprint.

Meridian
LCP 0.9s · AA · 98 Lighthouse
SaaS productivity
Nordsalt
LCP 1.1s · AA · 96 Lighthouse
D2C · WooCommerce
Chayya
LCP 0.8s · AA · 99 Lighthouse
Publishing · multilingual
Frondhill
LCP 1.0s · AA · 97 Lighthouse
Services · B2B
Lavenir
LCP 1.3s · AA · 95 Lighthouse
E-commerce · beauty
Stratos
LCP 0.9s · AA · 98 Lighthouse
Content · SaaS

Need a WordPress site that actually performs?

Send us a one-paragraph brief about the business, the editorial cadence, and where you want the site in three years. We will come back with a free, honest plan — fixed scope, fixed targets.

Request a discovery call
Where it shows up

Four kinds of business, one WordPress engineering team behind them.

The same WordPress engineering capability adapts to four very different commercial contexts. Visual language stays consistent; what changes is the content model, the integrations, and the editorial workflow we build around the team.

SaaS marketing

Product-led marketing

SaaS marketing sites with clean information architecture, fast page builds for new launches, and an ACF Pro content model the marketing team can extend without engineering.

Services & B2B

Consulting & advisory

Consulting, advisory, agency, and professional-services sites. Sector-led navigation, case-study and white-paper publishing, gated content where it earns its keep.

Publishing & media

Editorial platforms

Editorial-grade publishing with custom post types, taxonomy, author profiles, and the search and discovery surfaces that keep readers engaged across long catalogues.

E-commerce

WooCommerce storefronts

WooCommerce stores from small catalogues to multi-region storefronts. Custom checkouts, payment-gateway logic, subscription billing, ERP and CRM hooks.

Client stories

Two WordPress engagements, and what changed for the businesses behind them.

Meridian

SaaS productivity · UK + Europe · 2024–2025
The situation

An overweight, plugin-heavy WordPress site that loaded in 4.2 seconds on mobile was costing Meridian roughly 30% of its trial sign-ups. Marketing could not ship landing pages without engineering. SEO had stalled despite content investment.

What we did

Rebuilt the site on a custom theme; cut the plugin footprint from 41 to 11; moved hosting to Kinsta; shipped a new ACF Pro content model the marketing team could extend without engineering; tuned Core Web Vitals against real Chrome user data; rebuilt the on-page SEO foundations with schema per template type.

The outcome

LCP moved from 4.2s to 0.9s. Mobile sign-up conversion was up 38% within the first eight weeks. Lighthouse mobile score moved from 32 to 98. Marketing now ships landing pages independently of engineering. SEO impressions roughly doubled over the first six months.

More about Meridian →

Chayya

Long-form publishing · multilingual · 2024–2026
The situation

A 6,000-article publisher with three language editions had outgrown its template-based WordPress site. Editorial throughput was capped by the content model; the editorial team was working around the CMS rather than with it. Multilingual SEO was leaking through hreflang errors.

What we did

Rebuilt the content model around how the editorial team actually works (commissioning, drafting, peer review, scheduling, syndication); added WPML with hreflang done properly and per-region content overrides; shipped a custom-themed publishing platform; built an internal-link automation system; tuned the site for sub-1-second LCP globally via Cloudflare edge caching.

The outcome

Global LCP under 0.8 seconds. Editorial throughput up roughly 40%. Organic traffic followed within the first quarter. Three language editions live and the team is shipping a fourth (Arabic) without engineering help.

More about Chayya →
For agencies & product teams

The WordPress engineering team behind the agency.

Roughly 35% of our WordPress work is built for other agencies, product teams, and consultancies — under their brand, against their clients' deadlines. Three partnership models, all NDA-protected, with senior WordPress engineers working in time zones that overlap the UK, EU, and US workday.

01 · Partnership model

White-label WordPress development

Your brand. Our engineers. We never appear in front of your client — all communication, deliverables, and code go out under your name. The standard model for agencies that win WordPress projects but don't want to hire in-house WP engineering.

  • NDA & sub-contract in place before any work begins
  • Code, design files, and deliverables shipped under your brand
  • Joint slack / email channels with your team only
  • You stay client-facing; we stay implementation-facing
Used by: digital agencies, marketing firms, brand studios
02 · Partnership model

Agency-of-record & dedicated WP team

A pod of senior WordPress engineers, a front-end developer, and a project lead working as your in-house WordPress capacity — full-time or fractional, month-to-month or annual. The choice when WordPress is core to your service mix and hiring in-house is slower or more expensive than partnering.

  • Dedicated pod: 2 to 6 engineers + lead, scaled to your roadmap
  • Direct integration into your project tools (Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Asana)
  • Monthly capacity commitment; retainer or rolling SoW
  • Code ownership transferred to your repos
Used by: full-service agencies, SaaS product teams
03 · Partnership model

Capacity overflow & sprint-by-sprint

When your in-house WordPress team is full and the next project cannot wait. Sprint-by-sprint engagement, no commitment beyond the current two-week sprint, ready to pick up scoped work within 5 to 7 business days from green-light.

  • Two-week minimum sprint, rolling renewal
  • Scoped fixed-price work — feature build, migration, performance pass
  • Fast spin-up: 5 to 7 business days from signed SoW
  • No long-term commitment; ramp up or down per sprint
Used by: agencies with seasonal WP demand spikes
NDA-protectedStandard NDA, sub-contract, and IP transfer in place before any work begins.
Time-zone overlapWorking hours overlap with UK mornings, EU workday, and US afternoons every business day.
Single point of contactNamed project lead on every engagement. No agency-side account churn.
Your repos, your codeCode ownership transfers cleanly. We work in your Git, your hosting, your tooling.
Already running an agency or product team? Explore our white-label terms Start a partner conversation
Why not

Cheap WordPress shops & DIY builders vs WordPress done properly.

Two routes most businesses consider before they hire an engineering team. Both look cheaper on month one. Neither holds up by year three. Here is what each one actually delivers — and where it falls short.

Cheap WordPress shop
  • Theme bought from ThemeForest, then "customised" with 40 plugins
  • Loads in 4 to 7 seconds on mobile; fails every Core Web Vital
  • No content model — every page is a page builder soup of widgets
  • Breaks on the next WordPress major version
  • Cheap up-front; expensive to rebuild in 18 to 24 months
DIY builder (Wix / Squarespace / Elementor)
  • Drag-and-drop interface that any non-developer can operate
  • Hosted, fixed templates, fixed performance ceiling
  • Hits a wall the moment you need custom functionality, integrations, or scale
  • Lock-in: you cannot export the site or move hosts
  • Year-three cost often higher than custom WordPress
Custom WordPress at Dream Steps
  • Custom theme · 10 to 15 plugins · ACF Pro content model
  • Sub-1.5-second LCP · WCAG 2.2 AA · 95+ Lighthouse mobile
  • Content model the editorial team can extend without engineering
  • Modern PHP · CDN edge cache · object cache · daily backups
  • Higher in year one, dramatically lower across years two and three combined

Cheap WordPress is the most expensive WordPress.

The savings show up on the invoice in month one. The cost shows up in the rebuild, the lost organic traffic, the editorial workarounds, and the abandoned plans for things you cannot do on the platform you chose. Every cheap WordPress shop we have inherited has cost the client more in rebuild than a custom build would have cost first time round.

DIY builders work for the brief they were built for.

Small marketing sites that will not change much. The moment the business needs more — integrations, custom workflows, scale — you are either rebuilding or working around the platform. The work-around is rarely cheaper than the rebuild, and the rebuild is rarely cheaper than starting with custom WordPress from day one.

A custom WordPress build does more, lasts longer, and gets out of the way.

It costs more up front because that is what it costs to design the system around your business rather than fit your business around someone else's template. Three years in, the maths favours it on almost every commercial axis we have measured — build cost, performance, SEO, editorial throughput, total cost of ownership.

— The honest read

Build the WordPress site that fits the business in three years.

Request a WordPress engagement
Common questions

Questions WordPress buyers actually ask.

Fourteen of the most common WordPress questions, answered straight. If yours is not below, send it and we will reply with a real answer — not a sales pitch.

Why choose Dream Steps for Python development?

We have shipped 1,000+ Python applications since 2015 across Django products, FastAPI services, REST APIs, AI backends, and data pipelines. Our 40-person team of senior Python engineers, designers, and project leads in Noida, India works in time zones overlapping the UK, EU, and US workday. We hold every Python build to four hard targets: p95 API latency under 200 ms, 85%+ test coverage on critical paths, a clean mypy type check, and an OWASP Top 10 audit passing before launch. We also build the AI features most products will need next, so the backend we ship is ready for them rather than needing a rebuild.

Can you white-label Python and Django development for our agency?

Yes — roughly 35% of our Python work is built for other agencies and consultancies under NDA. Three partnership models: white-label (your brand, our engineers, fully invisible), agency-of-record (a dedicated Python pod working as your in-house capacity), and capacity overflow (sprint-by-sprint engagement when your in-house team is full). Code ownership transfers to your repositories. Time zones overlap with the UK, EU, and US workday, and we run inside your tooling — Slack, Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Asana — as standard.

Where is your Python team based?

Our entire Python engineering team is based in Noida, India — 40 people in our iThum Tower B office, founded in 2015. We work with product teams and agencies across the UK, US, Ireland, Australia, the UAE, Germany, and the Netherlands. Working hours overlap with UK mornings, the full EU workday, and US afternoons. For agency partners we run in their tooling — Slack, Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Asana — as standard.

Should I use Django or FastAPI?

Django for whole products — apps with users, an admin, content, and a database at the centre, where the batteries-included framework saves months. FastAPI for APIs and services, async and I/O-bound workloads, and AI backends, where a lean typed framework fits better. They are not really competitors, and the architecture we ship most often uses both: Django for the product, FastAPI for the focused services that need to be async and fast. We will tell you on the discovery call which one — or which combination — fits your build.

How much does a custom Python or Django build cost?

Custom Python builds range from focused FastAPI services through to full Django SaaS products and AI backends. The right scope drivers are the number of features, the user roles and permissions, third-party integrations, whether AI or data work is involved, and the team’s Python maturity. We scope every engagement against the specific brief, are competitive with established engineering rates internationally, and are honest about which features can wait until phase two.

How long does a Python build take?

A typical Django SaaS application takes 10 to 16 weeks. A FastAPI service or API for a separate frontend takes 6 to 12 weeks. A multi-tenant Django platform with billing and admin takes 14 to 20 weeks. An AI or RAG backend takes 8 to 14 weeks depending on the retrieval and orchestration complexity. We work in two-week sprints with weekly demos and a deployable staging environment from sprint one.

Will my Python application be fast?

Yes — every Python application we ship hits p95 API latency under 200 ms on real production traffic, query count under 10 per read request, and a cache hit ratio above 80% on cacheable endpoints. Python itself is rarely the bottleneck in a web request, because the request spends its time waiting on the database, not running Python. We achieve the targets through proper eager-loading, database indexing, Redis caching, task queues for slow work, async views where I/O fan-out justifies them, and a profiled production database. Performance is part of the build, not an afterthought.

Do you write typed Python?

Yes — every Python build we ship is typed end to end and checked with mypy in strict mode on every CI run. We use Pydantic for request and response validation at the edges of the system, type hints throughout the code, and we treat a type error as a build failure. Typed Python is what makes a codebase safe to refactor, and it is the foundation for reliable AI features, where the model’s output has to be parsed into a known shape before anything downstream trusts it.

Can you build a backend that's ready for AI features?

Yes — and it is one of the main reasons teams come to us for Python. Most products will need an AI feature within the next year, and whether that is a clean addition or a painful rebuild depends on the backend underneath. We build Python backends that are typed, tested, and structured so that a retrieval-augmented feature, an AI workflow, or an LLM integration can be added as a service rather than retrofitted into a monolith. For the deeper version of that work, see our AI Engineering page.

Django, FastAPI, or Django REST Framework — which do you build with?

All three, depending on what fits. Django for full products with an admin and an ORM at the centre. Django REST Framework when a Django product also needs a clean API for a mobile app or single-page frontend — it builds production APIs without leaving Django. FastAPI for standalone services, async and I/O-bound workloads, and AI backends. Many of our builds use more than one — a Django product with a FastAPI service alongside it for the AI work. We recommend the combination on the discovery call based on the product, not on fashion.

Can you build accessible Django admin and web apps (WCAG 2.2 AA)?

Yes. WCAG 2.2 AA is our baseline on every Python application’s frontend — colour contrast checked per token, full keyboard navigation, screen-reader landmarks audited, form labels reviewed, focus management on modals. We tighten the Django admin’s defaults for accessibility, and use accessible component primitives for any React or Vue frontend sitting on a FastAPI or Django REST Framework backend. Accessibility is part of the build, not a fix after launch.

Will you maintain the Python app after launch?

Yes. We offer monthly Python maintenance retainers covering security patches, Python and Django version upgrades, dependency updates with pip-audit, database performance monitoring, task queue health monitoring, error tracking with Sentry, backup verification, and a fixed allocation of engineering hours per month. For teams without a dedicated Python engineer in-house, this is how the application stays healthy, secure, and fast past month one.

Can you take over or upgrade an existing Python or Django codebase?

Yes. We regularly take over Python codebases — adding the tests, types, and observability they were missing — and run Django version upgrades, which are typically 4 to 10 week engagements depending on how far behind the codebase is. The process: audit the codebase for deprecated patterns and security gaps, add a test suite if one is missing, upgrade Django one major version at a time with tests passing at each step, update dependencies, then deploy to staging before production. We have done many of these, including Python 2 to 3 migrations on older systems.

What stack do you ship for a typical Python SaaS or AI backend?

Our default 2026 Python stack: Python 3.12; Django with Django REST Framework for product backends, or FastAPI for standalone and AI services; PostgreSQL with proper indexing, plus the pgvector extension for AI retrieval; Redis for cache, sessions, and as the Celery broker; Celery for background work; Pydantic for validation and mypy strict for type checking; pytest for tests; Sentry for error tracking; and structured logging with an observability tool. For AI backends we add the OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs behind a thin abstraction so models can be swapped. We adjust to the team and requirements, but that is what we recommend by default.

Do you build the AI features themselves, or just the backend?

Both. The Python backend is the foundation, and we also build the AI features that run on it — retrieval-augmented generation, AI workflows, and in-product LLM features — with evaluations and observability so the AI is measured rather than hoped about. This Python and Django page covers the engineering foundation; our AI Engineering page covers the AI systems, the eval methodology, and the service-level objectives in depth. Many engagements start as a Python backend and grow into AI work once the foundation is solid.

Ready when you are

Build a Python backend your team can run — and grow AI on — for a decade.

Tell us about the application, the team, the integrations, and whether AI is on the roadmap. We will come back with a written brief, a realistic build cost, and a clear set of performance, type-safety, security, and test-coverage targets we will hold ourselves to.

What to expect

A 30-minute conversation about your business, the editorial team that will run the site, and where you want to be in three years. No slide deck, no pitch.

You walk away with

A written brief naming the build scope, the performance and accessibility targets we will hold to, the timeline, and a realistic build cost.